Sunday, August 16, 2009

no evidence of a Foreign invasion in Indus Swaraswat civilization

Early endologist wish to control and convert the followers of Vedic culture therefore

they widely propagated that the Vedas was simply mythology. MaxMullar perhaps the most well known early Sanskritists and endologist although later in life he qualify the Vedas initially

wrote tat the Vedas where worse than savage and India must b conquered again by education

it religion is doomed . Thomas Macaulay who introduced English education into India own it to

make the residence in to race tat Indian in blood and co lour but English in taste and

opinion and morals and intellect. However the German philosopher author Sophenhour

stated tat the Sanskrit understanding of this endologist was like tat of young school

boys

.This Early endologist devised the Aryan invasion theory denying India’s Vedic

past they thought tat the English educational system is superior .They intentionally

misinterpreted Sanskrit text to make the Vedas look primitive and they systematically

try to make Indian ashamed of their own culture thus the action of this endologist seems

to indicate tat they where motivated by a racial bias .

Innumerable Archeological findings

and their analysis they recently brought the Aryan invasion theory to serious question

this theory is still thought as fact in many educational systems despite much contrary

evidence. The Aryan invasion theory is tat the Vedic Aryans entered India b/w 1500 &

1200 BCE .They conquered the native Dravidian culture by virtue of their superiority due to their

horses and iron weapons .They imported the Vedic culture and its literatures. This Aryan

invasion theory however de-prise the inhabitance of India of their Vedic heritage the

wealth of our culture came from foreign soil .

The Aryan invasion theory raises an

interesting dilemma called Follis Paradox on the one hand we hav the vast Vedic

literature without any Archeological evidence finds associated with them and on the

other hand we have 2500 Archeological sites from the Indus Sara-swat Civilization without

any literature associated with them. A propanderance of contemporary evidence now seems to

indicate this r one and the same cultures this certainly eliminates this Paradox and

makes perfect sense to an unbiased researchers .

Facts which kept as serious doubt on the

Aryan invasion theory are , their is no evidence of an Aryan home land outside of India

mentioned anywhere in the Vedas on the contrary Veda speak of mighty Swaraswati

river and other places Indigenous to India .To-date no evidence for a Foreign intrusion

found neither Archeological linguistic cultural nor genetic . Their r more than 2500

archeological sites two third of which recently discovered dried-up Swaraswati river

bed this sites shows a cultural continuity with the Vedic literature from the early

Harappen civilization up to the present day India .

Several independence studies of the

drying up of the Swaraswati river bed all indicate same time period of 1900 BCE.

The significance of establishing this date of the drying up of the Swaraswiti river

is, tat it pusses the for the composition of the Rig-Veda back to approx. 3000 BCE as an

prononciated by the Vedic literature itself. The late dating of Vedic literatures by

endologist based on speculated date of 1500 BCE for the Aryan Invasion and 1200

BCE for the Rig-Veda both now r disproved by Scientific Evidence .Maxmullar the

principal architect of Aryan Invasion theory admitted the purely speculative nature of

his Vedic Chronology and in his last work publish shortly b4 his death THE SIX SYSTEMS

OF INDIAN PHYLOSOPY he wrote : whatever may b the date of Vedicans the 1500 or 15000

BCE they hav their own unique place and standby themselves in the literature of the

World .

It can b scientifically proven tat the Vedic Culture is indigenous through

Archeology the study of cultural continuity by linguistic analysis and genetic

research .For example language and symbolism found on the Harappen seals r very

Vedic . we find on this seal the own symbol the leaf of the Aswata or the holly

banyan tree as well as the swastika or sign of auspiciousness mentioned throughout

the Vedas . OM is mentioned in the Mundaka and kAtaka Upanishad as well as the

Bhagavad Gita.The holy Aswatha Tree is mentioned in Iteria and Satapatha Brahmana as

well as the Titriasamahita and Katayana Smriti .The pectoral script of this

Harappen seals has been deciphered as consistently Vedic and termed protoBrami as a

pre-Sanskrit script.

High resolution satellite images hav verified description in the

Rig-Veda of the descent of the Ancient Swaraswati river from its source in the

Himalayas to the Arabian sea. Pure and her course from the mountains to the ocean

alone of streams Swaraswati hav listened. They mighty Swaraswati river and its

civilization r referred to in the Rig-Veda more than 50 times proving its drying up

of the Swaraswati river was subsequent to the origin of the Rig-Veda pushing this

date of origin further back in to antiquity casting further doubt on Imaginary

date for the so called Aryan invasion .

The Satellite image clearly shows the Indus

Swaraswat river system extending from the Himalayas to the Arabian sea. The drying up

of Swaraswiti river around 1900 BCE is confirmed archeologically .Following major

tectonic movements or plate shifts in the Earths crust the primary case of this

drying up is due to the capture of the Saraswiti river main tributaries .The

Satluj and Vitasta by other rivers .Although early studies based on limited

archeological Evidence produce contradictory conclusions resent independent studies

such as tat of archeologist James Shaffer 1993 showed no evidence of a Foreign invasion in

the Indus Swaraswat civilization and tat a cultural continuity cud b traced back for

millennia , in other words archeology does not support the Aryan Invasion theory.